
Chief Jim Bueermann (ret.), President, Police Foundation
As I write this letter on October 2, 2017, the country is learning of yet another deadly shooting that occurred last night in Las Vegas, Nevada. It now has the dubious distinction of the worst mass murder on American soil since 9/11. At this moment, Las Vegas first responders are responding to a scene where at least 58 people were killed and hundreds wounded by a gunman who fired on a large crowd at a concert.
It is unfathomable to me how frequently our first responders are confronted with responding to horrific incidents such as this one and the one that occurred at Pulse on June 12, 2016. In recent years, there have been countless domestic and international mass casualty and terrorist attacks that highlight both the worst of humanity and the best—such as the bravery and resilience demonstrated by communities like Orlando.
Like many across the nation on June 12, 2016, my heart broke as I watched the news that Sunday morning. As the sun rose, it became apparent that Orlando was at that time the site of the deadliest terrorist attack on American soil since September 11, 2001. More than 100 innocent people were shot—leaving 49 dead and 53 with gunshot wounds, as well as five people with other injuries—as part of a vicious and senseless attack at the Pulse nightclub.
The challenges confronting the principal public safety agencies responding to this incident included: transitions in the operational and tactical strategies from active shooter to barricaded suspect with hostages to terrorism; the dark and difficult layout of the nightclub; the safety and well-being of countless hostages and officers; multiple local, state, and federal agencies arriving with sometimes overlapping roles and responsibilities; and agencies with differing policies and practices using different communications systems and protocols. In addition, the constant threat of secondary attacks and explosions required decisive action with little conclusive information under extremely grisly and difficult circumstances.
While our assessment team confirmed that the Orlando Police Department’s (OPD) tactical response was consistent with the its policies, procedures, and training as well as nationally recognized promising practices, the current and evolving threat environment demands that our nation’s public safety agencies better prepare command personnel and first responders to prevent and respond to the next attack. It is imperative that our national homeland security, law enforcement, and public safety communities coordinate, debate, and create guidelines on the police response to acts of mass public violence and terrorism that meet this increasing and evolving threat.
Bringing new advances to policing lies at the core of the Police Foundation’s mission. Central to our research and work with law enforcement agencies is the idea that it is imperative to honestly examine, analyze, and study police-involved incidents to identify “lessons learned” to continually advance the profession. The increased frequency of these incidents and the continual evolution of the challenges faced mandate that public safety agencies must continue to evolve and adapt their training and responses to meet these challenges. Certainly, that is true of this incident.
Those who responded to the Pulse that night are some of the bravest and most dedicated of public servants. Undoubtedly, their well-trained and decisive actions saved lives. It is because of the efforts of all involved in the response on June 12 that the suspect was neutralized before he could inflict more damage and devastation. This assessment—and the lessons learned—are not designed to “Monday morning quarterback.” Rather, they are intended to provide a basis for careful study of the tactics used by the terrorist and the actions taken by Orlando-area public safety agencies that day. It is an effort to enhance the safety of first responders and the public at large and further aide in preparing for, responding to, and recovering from mass casualty and terrorist incidents like the one that occurred last night.
I am grateful to Orlando Police Chief John W. Mina and the OPD for their cooperation with our review. Not only were they willing to answer our questions, provide us access to their department and vital information, and provide us unwavering support but they also invited our team and our examination of the response to this attack in an effort to help advance policing response to terrorist attacks. Deputy Chief Robert Anzueto provided our team with exceptional access and support throughout the project. In addition, I am grateful to the hundreds of interviewees who generously gave us their time. They answered questions candidly, and we are forever thankful for their willingness to tell us the story of their experiences and rehash traumatizing moments. It was only through their eyes that we were able to gain a true understanding of the complexities involved. It is extremely important to acknowledge the dedication and professionalism of the many law enforcement and first responder agencies involved in this incident. In addition to the Orlando Police Department, the individuals from 26 additional agencies that responded all performed their duties valiantly.
I would like to express my gratitude for the hard work of our assessment team: Chief Frank Straub (ret.), PhD; Jack Cambria; Chief Jane Castor (ret.); Ben Gorban; Dr. Brett Meade; David Waltemeyer, and Jennifer Zeunik. In addition, I would like to thank our Police Foundation staff, including Blake Norton, James Burch, Rebecca Benson, Joyce Iwashita, and Siobhan Scott for their hard work and support throughout the review.
Finally, we offer this work as a tribute to the memory of the victims and survivors of the attack on Pulse, and to the resiliency of the City Beautiful. May we remember them and honor them by diligently applying the lessons learned.
Chief Jim Bueermann (ret.)
President
Police Foundation